This Friday, January 11th, our seven-school list is due to the school system for our public school lottery requests. This morning I visited yet another school—Alvarado—that I liked (Gabe saw it weeks ago and liked it, and said I should look too). Arts, Spanish immersion, cool natty Principal, a kiln! a kick-ass PTA. And yet, I feel so unclear. They are bursting with pride (and should be compared to other PTAs!) because they raise $200,000 a year. This seems low to me, in relation to where we live. And they are thrilled that the kids have art and PE once a week from the PTA extra funds. This sounds thin to me. Maybe not. Who knows? And then, as I was leaving, I was suddenly struck with the idea that the most important thing is who my kids get for a teacher...could this be true? And in this case, are "experienced" teachers good or bad? More tired and burnt out or smarter?
Other parents and teachers and Principals all talk about how "you will know" when you walk into the school that is right for you and we don't. I mean, we seem to like the most popular schools that are hard to get into—as most people do. This is frustrating and confusing.
The other thing people say is, "Don't worry! No matter what school he goes to Jonah will get a great education because his parents are smart achievers and you will help him." I hate this rationalization. It's bullshit. If he is in an amazing place that can celebrate his power and truly help him in the places where he will struggle, he will have an great education. He needs a place where there is time for real creativity and extra attention for individual kids' personalities and temperaments. I went to well regarded public schools in a rich suburb, and they were awful for me.
I am just venting because I am scared.
We see two more schools tomorrow, and then it's time to make that list. Wish us luck! (But I don't know exactly for what!)